Category Archives: Moral Relativism

Can the WE and the FBI Survive The Comey/Clinton Chronicles?

Image result for comey clinton

Yesterday, October 28th, James Comey, the Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation sent a letter to a select group of 16 Congressional Committee leaders, eight Republicans and eight Democrats, announcing that:

“Yesterday, the investigative team briefed me on their recommendation with respect to seeking access to emails that have recently been found in an unrelated case. Because those emails appear to be pertinent to our investigation, I agreed that we should take appropriate steps to obtain and review them.”

He went on to say that:

“At the same time, however, given that we do not know the significance of this newly discovered collection of emails, I don’t want to create a misleading impression. In trying to strike that balance, in a brief letter, and in the middle of an election season, there is significant risk of being misunderstood, but I wanted you to hear directly from me about it.”

The “unrelated case” was the investigation of Anthony Weiner, the husband of Clinton’s top aide and confidant, Huma Abedin.  Weiner adds his own level of sleaze to the Clinton scandal portfolio as he is being investigated for “sexting” with a 15-year-old minor female.  Ostensibly, the Weiner investigation led to emails sent by or forwarded from Clinton/Abedin and others.  These emails uncovered communications not yet discovered in the previous FBI Clinton Email probe.  This latter point is a legal violation of a Congressional subpoena, past FOIA requests, and the prior FBI investigation itself.

Personally, I credit an open letter sent to Director Comey from a retired FBI special agent, Hugh Galyean, following Comey’s “non-indictment indictment” of Hillary Clinton in July of this year.  In Comey’s July address, he carefully laid out a criminal case against Hillary Clinton then surprisedly announced at the end of his address that he would not be recommending any legal action to be taken against Clinton by the DOJ.  Since then, a large number of former and current FBI agents and Department of Justice prosecutors have criticized Comey’s lack of referral in the Clinton investigation.  I believe Comey succumbed to weight of being known as the FBI Director who abandoned the agencies principle for political expediency.

Enough of what I think of Comey’s past and present action or inaction.  The following is the full text of the letter from SA Galyean.  Read it for yourself, then decide if a majority of your staff, and specifically the total of the Clinton Investigation team, held this opinion of you and your actions.  Could you remain silent and take no further action?  Or, would you step up and do the right thing?  Decide for yourself…

Open Letter to Comey from Retired Agent Galyean

Mr. James Comey, Director

Federal Bureau of Investigation

J. Edgar Hoover Building

935 Pennsylvania Avenue N.W

Washington, D.C.  20535-0001

Sir,

I am writing regarding your public statement in July, 2016 informing the American people that the FBI investigation of Hillary Clinton was being closed without referring it to a Federal Grand Jury or the Attorney General of the U. S. for a decision whether or not to indict her. Strangely, you eloquently laid out enough of the evidence deduced from the investigation to strongly indicate there was abundant evidence uncovered during the investigation and interview of her to not only indict but to convict her in  Federal Court.­­­­­­­ ­­­­­­However, you personally  re-worded and soft-pedaled the actions she took as Secretary of State describing her actions as “extremely careless” in using a personal email and un-secured server for her communications while Secretary of State. You rewrote the statute, which is not your job.

As a retired Special Agent of the FBI, I have standing to write this letter. My thirty years in law enforcement, including 22 years as a Special Agent with the FBI have given me the knowledge, expertise and experience to question and confront you for your perplexing actions, which (as you well know) were outside the normal standard operating procedure of the FBI and Federal judicial procedures. Some of the finest people in the world proudly carry the credentials of FBI Agent and you have soiled them and not allowed them to speak. But I will not be silent.

Sorry, but NO SIR, MS Clinton was not merely careless or extremely careless. She was not even negligent or grossly negligent (as the statute requires). Hillary Clinton was knowingly purposeful in her decisions and actions to set up a server under her exclusive control and possession in order to control what information was available to the American public and Congress regarding her actions as Secretary of State. Furthermore, she took those government-owned communications into her personal possession after leaving her position and knowingly and willingly attempted to destroy them so her nefarious actions could never be known or used as evidence of her corrupt moral character against her.

Sir, what possessed you? Did you cave in to political pressure to unilaterally come to this decision? I fear that is the case, and Rule of Law be damned. I am embarrassed for and ashamed of you. You have set a precedent that can never be rectified… and certainly not justified. Shame on you, Sir. You ought to resign right now in disgrace for what you have done to tarnish the reputation of the finest Law Enforcement Agency in the world… for entirely political reasons.

Normally, an investigation will be assigned to an agent, or team of agents with one being the Case agent, or the lead investigator. When the investigation is complete, an investigative report will be presented to the U.S. Attorney for the Federal District involved.  It would be the U.S. Attorney who decides whether to decline prosecution for that investigation… NOT the FBI agent. But in the Clinton investigation, YOU (unilaterally) decided not to forward the investigation to the U.S. Attorney or the Attorney General of the U.S., but instead personally made the decision not to prosecute her or even provide the information to a Federal Grand Jury.  You were wrong to take this upon yourself.

Sir, in order to indict a subject, only a preponderance of evidence, or 51% is needed for probable cause to exist. You did not think even that level of probability existed? Who do you think you are fooling? What judicial proceeding did you think you were following?

Throughout my years with the FBI, I (along with my fellow agents) took great pride in conducting each investigation in an unbiased manner regardless of the subject’s position or standing in the community.

All were treated equally under the law. But you, Sir, decided to allow this corrupt, evil and nasty human being to go free and unchallenged for her treasonous actions (yes, treasonous, in my opinion) which threatened the security of this nation. Furthermore, you stopped short of investigating the Clinton Foundation as a RICO case (Racketeering Influenced and Corrupt Organization.  This is a RICO case if

there ever were one. Even an untrained person can tell from the communications which were recovered that Hillary Clinton spent more time working for the Clinton Foundation while Secretary of State than on State Business.  It may be argued that Hillary did not do any State business UNLESS the Clinton Foundation benefitted.  You decided to just let this uncomfortable truth alone without addressing it.

I will conclude with this:  Following my retirement from the FBI, I volunteered for a 12 month tour of duty in Afghanistan as a Law Enforcement Professional, embedded with U.S. forces as a subject matter expert in counter-terrorism investigations.  For most of that year I operated “outside the wire” patrolling with the troops, interviewing witnesses to IED incidents and gathering evidence on the bad guys.  The results of my work would then be reported through secure channels to the Commanding Officer.  All reports and communications were required to be transmitted via secure and encrypted devices.  Occasionally my remote location in the mountains of Afghanistan made transmission impossible and I would have to fly back to Bagram Air Base in order to securely report to the Commander of the battle space.   It would have been convenient if I could have just called the Commander on my personal cell phone or written him an email on my personal laptop.  But, had I done so I would have been reporting classified information via an unsecured device and it could have been compromised. These were, relative to Secretary of State communications, low-level classifications of Secret.  Had I ever sent even one in such a manner I would have been prosecuted and sent to Federal Prison for 20 years or so.  That is how serious this violation is considered.

Now, because of you, Hillary Clinton is allowed to continue her RICO activities and is running for President of the United States, the most powerful position in the world.  You have trampled on the Rule of Law and destroyed the trust of the American people in the FBI and in unbiased enforcement of the law.  How do you sleep at night? It is time for you to go and work for the Clinton Foundation.

Sincerely,

Hugh W. Galyean

(FBI Agent, Retired)

 

Your decision on November. 

Do you want 4 more years of the Clinton’s, Abedin, and Weiner lawlessness and stain on the highest office of the United States? 

It is time to

Drain the Swamp!

 

RD Pierini

@RDPierini

 

 

Hat Tips

http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2016/10/28/comey-fbi-memo-agents-clinton-weiner-emails/

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2016/10/29/exclusive-comey-memo-to-fbi-staffers-says-election-timing-required-disclosure-renewed-probe.html

http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2016/10/a_retired_fbi_agent_addresses_james_comey_on_the_hillary_clinton_investigation.html

 

2016 Election and Christianity/Catholicism vs Moral Relativism

(From our Sister Site, Christianity-In-Vogue)

Hillary Clinton Represents Progressive Globalist Leftist

Anti-Catholic / Anti-Christian Abolitionists

no-christianityGoal:  Corrupt or Eliminate Catholicism/Christianity

To Establish Moral Relativism as THE Religion

WikiLeaks confirmed that the Progressive Globalist Left have the elimination of Christianity or the complete transformation of Christianity where it accepts moral relativism as its core belief.  In 2011, email threads between Communications Director Jennifer Palmieri, Campaign Chairman John Podesta and John Halpin from the Center for American Progress, spelled out the Progressive Globalist Left and the Clinton campaign goals to force Christianity and Catholics to accept gay marriage, birth control, abortion, euthanasia, and other policies considered to be an anathema to Christianity/Catholicism. 

The saddest part of this story is that 55% of Catholic voters support Hillary and only 34% support Trump.

  This Clinton Trio slammed conservative Catholic’s faith as; “amazing bastardization of the faith”.  As someone who was baptized Catholic then as a Baptist, I firmly believe that Christian/Catholic faith is based on the Holy Bible and that our beliefs have not been “bastardized” as they are inextricably tied to scripture.  Some have tried to bend scripture or ignore passages that are uncomfortable for them but they are the outliers, not those who ground their faith in the Bible.

Ken Auletta’s for the New Yorker mockingly wrote about Rupert Murdock, Owner of News Corp the parent of Fox News; “Friggin’ Murdoch baptized his kids in Jordan where John the Baptist baptized Jesus”.   Ridicule of faith practices or scriptural references displays the overwhelming godless psyche of a non believer who worships at the altar of moral relativism.   

John Halpin wrote to Podesta and Palmieri, “Many of the most powerful elements of the conservative movement are all Catholic (many converts) from the SC and think tanks to the media and social groups.  It’s an amazing bastardization of the faith. They must be attracted to the systematic thought and severely backwards gender relations and must be totally unaware of Christian democracy,”.  Halpin goes further than Auletta basically stating that scriptural teachings on “gender relations” that forbids same sex relationships is “severely backward”. 

The most idiotic statement, and one that exposes their collective ignorance, is the use of the term “Christian Democracy”.  This is code for moral relativism!  Christians and Catholics believe that the Scripture was given to man by God and that God never intended for us to engage in a democratic debate as to which part of scripture to follow!  The scripture is the scripture, it means what it says, and there is no room for moral relativism. 

God did not send down the 10 commandments and with a note saying pick any 7 of the 10 you like!

In 2015, Clinton herself stated that “deep-seated cultural codes, religious beliefs and structural biases have to be changed.”  She was referring to Christian and Catholic acceptance of abortion, gay marriage, birth control and other “legal” activities.  The dictate contained in the words “have to be changed” are scary and disturbing coming from a person who may become the President of the United States!  She and her staff consider religious tenants and beliefs to be BIASES rather than Scripturally Founded Faith Based Beliefs.  I wonder if she would say the same of Islam in public?  Probably not.

If you are a Christian or a Catholic (I do not like separating Catholics from Christians but that is another story) and you are thinking of voting for Hillary Clinton, please reconsider. 

  • Hillary is for abortion on demand at any point in gestation period. 

  • She is pro euthanasia as well. 

  • Hillary obviously believes that Christians and Catholics have to change their beliefs to conform to moral relativism. 

  • Hillary believes that the “Johnson Amendment”, forbidding the clergy from discussing political topics during church services, is perfectly fine and does not violate our first amendment rights but is absolutely does. 

Trump’s position on these topics is the polar opposite of Clintons and parallels our Scriptural Faith and Beliefs. Hillary will continue to erode the role God has in our nation and further condemn us to living in a godless society where morals are subject to anyone’s own desires,

EXCEPT FOR THOSE WHO BELIEVE IN GOD!

RD Pierini

@RDPierini

Hat Tips:

http://insider.foxnews.com/2016/10/11/wikileaks-hillary-clinton-campaign-aides-bash-catholics-evangelical-christians-palmieri http://www.christianpost.com/news/wikileaks-hillary-clinton-mock-evangelicals-and-conservative-catholics-podesta-email-palmieri-halpin-170718/

Radical Islamist/Sharia Conservatives, Gays S/B Exterminated

Wake UP LGBT Community

This is Not An Isolated Incident-You are Being Targeted

I have written time and time again warning the LGBT community to wake up and understand the threat to their very existence.  That threat is from Islamic/Sharia conservative beliefs that has even been codified in the laws and constitutions of various Islamic Nations.  In 1991, Iran added the following to their constitution: 

Sodomy is a crime, for which both partners are punished. The punishment is death if the participants are adults, of sound mind and consenting; the method of execution is for the Shari’a judge to decide.

The previous President of Iran claimed that there are no homosexuals in Iran.  He is correct, when found, they are quickly executed.

ISIS recently released videos of gays being thrown off of roof tops as a method of exterminating gays! 

ISIS Gays

The LGBT community is foolishly clinging to the US Progressive False Narrative that there is no such thing as Islamic Radicalism and that Sharia Law is an acceptable parallel legal system to our US Constitution and our Judicial System.  Why, because the Left has collected disparate groups like the LBGT and are trying to create a politically monolithic power structure.  Unfortunately, Radical Islam and the LGBT are diametrically opposed due to Sharia conservatism.  The members of the LGBT community will lose this fight and be exterminated whenever the radical Islamists choose to do so!

The LGBT community needs to stop focusing on “Christian Opposition” to the LGBT lifestyles and gay marriage. 

Not baking a wedding cake or providing flowers for a gay wedding is not quite the same thing as the mass extermination of individuals based on their LGBT group affiliation. 

The LGBT Community needs to get behind the Republican Presidential Candidate, Donald Trump and create a safe environment for US citizens first.  Unfortunately today’s attack in Orlando reminds us that the ultimate Civil Right is Life. 

Radical Islamists/Sharia Conservatives are committed to the extermination of LBGT individuals… 

Wake Up!

 

RD Pierini

@RDPierini

Hat Tips

http://www.answering-islam.org/Authors/Arlandson/homosexual.htm

http://www.religionfacts.com/homosexuality/islam

 

Progressives: Pregnant Women Can Drink Alcohol and Murder their Baby?

Pregnant Drinking

Many on the Progressive Left Stand Behind the Prohibition on Pregnant Women Drinking Alcohol.

And, Thinks is it Perfectly All Right for that Same Woman to Walk out of the Bar and to Planned Parenthood and Kill her baby, No Matter How Far Along She Is! 

NY City has dictated that bar tenders and wait staff cannot refuse to serve a pregnant women an alcoholic beverage.  The city is basing this decree on their opinion that “doing so would represent discrimination under the city’s Human Rights Law.”  NYC is being somewhat consistent.  They are encouraging the drinking of alcohol by pregnant women, which is deemed to be harmful to the unborn child, and also encourage and promote the killing of the unborn children via abortion, especially minority children!

How about smoking pot, doing drugs?  The left will do anything to condone behavior that may lead to increasing abortion but stands silent when pregnant women, children, and others are gunned down in the major progressive inner-cities of this nation. 

Yet, Progressives Feign Shock if you Accused Them of Promoting a Culture of Death! 

Planned Parenthood and the United Nations’ WHO continue to press for mandatory abortions for women infected with the Zika virus but will do nothing to lift the ban of using safe pesticides, that have been proven to work in eradicating mosquitos and controlling other diseases such as malaria.  Their agenda is death of the unborn rather than the overall safety of their citizens.

Who is speaking up for the unborn?  Not very many who are in power in the US. 

How about Protecting the Human Rights or Civil Rights of the Unborn! 

RD Pierini

@RDPierini

 

 

 

Hat Tips

 

Iowa-The Carson/Cruz Effect

We will never know the impact on this episode but it really does not make the Republican Party and some of its candidates look like they are above politics as usual.  This election is about a new beginning and “we the people” taking back our country.  Whoever we pick we must be able to trust.  Personally, for me, Cruz is no longer someone I could trust.

We will never know the impact on this episode but it really does not make the Republican Party and some of its candidates look like they are above politics as usual.  This election is about a new beginning and “we the people” taking back our country.  Whoever we pick we must be able to trust.  Personally, for me, Cruz is no longer someone I could trust.

While Iowa is now in our rear view mirror, it is important to at least add a couple of footnotes to our Campaign 2016 notebook.  The Iowa caucuses this year for the Republican Presidential primary featured a record turnout.  Both Cruz and Trump broke Republican individual vote count records.  Many precincts ran out of voting supplies.  and, Cruz erroneously communicated to his 1,500 precinct captains and workers that Ben Carson was dropping out of the race and they should let caucus goers know so they can change their vote to Cruz.  A Cruz Iowa staffer sent an email to all of the precinct captains that read:

“Breaking News. The press is reporting that Dr. Ben Carson is taking time off from the campaign trail after Iowa and making a big announcement next week,” the email read. “Please inform any Carson caucus goers of this news and urge them to caucus for Ted Cruz.”

Steve King, a congressman from Iowa and Cruz national co-chairman Tweeted out:

“Carson looks like he is out. Iowans need to know before they vote. Most will go to Cruz, I hope. https://twitter.com/moody/status/694320149432651776 

These Communications went out BEFORE the Caucus Voting Began Giving the Precinct Captains Ample Time to lLbby Carson voters to Vote for Cruz.

Ted Cruz defended the statements, and apologized to Carson, by blaming CNN for falsely reporting that Carson was dropping out of the race and returning to Florida.  You can find the timeline of the CNN reporting at http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2016/02/04/cruz-carson-email-trump-iowa-cnn/. You can make up your own mind as to what CNN reported, or not.

But, the Real Issue is Why the Cruz Campaign DID NOT Call the Carson Campaign to Confirm the story

This wasn’t some minor story.  The story that the #3 or #4 was dropping out of the race prior to the caucus starting was a very big deal.  For a candidate for the president of the United States to run with this story without even picking up the phone to call Carson is at the very least intellectually and morally dishonest.  Sorry Cruz fans but you cannot ride in claiming to be a true Christian then engage in shady campaign practices, especially a guy like Ben Carson.  But then again, we are way to used to this type of tactic by our elected officials.

I really thought Cruz was better than this.

Theories on the Potential Impact of the Misinformation:

Impact on Carson:  Apologists like Rush Limbaugh point out that this misinformation would not have gained Carson sufficient votes to win the Iowa Caucus.  That is really not the point as the difference between 4th and 3rd from a campaign fund raising point of view is huge.  IF Carson would have picked up 10 votes per precinct, that would have given him an additional 15,000 votes.  Some of these votes may have been switched to Rubio and if they were, Carson would have been in 3rd place.  This would have given Carson a big advantage in the first quarter fund raising game.

Impact on Trump:  Assuming that the misinformation caused only 4 voters to go to Cruz from Carson who were both battling over the Evangelical vote.  That would equate to 4 X 1,500 or 6,000 votes.  This would have all but assured a Trump win in Iowa over Cruz. 

Two things are sure.

  1. The misinformation campaign by Cruz had some impact on the final voting. 

  2. Cruz should have confirmed that the story was true before running with it prior to the caucus starting.  If Cruz himself did not know about the misinformation campaign, which I doubt, he should have held someone accountable. 

We will never know the impact on this episode but it really does not make the Republican Party and some of its candidates look like they are above politics as usual.  This election is about a new beginning and “we the people” taking back our country.  Whoever we pick we must be able to trust.  Personally, for me, Cruz is no longer someone I could trust.

Hat Tip

 

Update: Zita Virus Virus PP Abortion Push into South America

See Previous Post: Planned Parenthood-Stalking Brazilian Zika Babies to Kill-Pope Francis?    http://wp.me/pY51c-OI

Planned Parenthood and other abortion advocates are using the Zita virus as a scare tactic to get South American governments to legalize abortions in their countries or remove restrictions on abortion in countries where abortions are allowed.  They are driving headlines like:

Fear of microcephaly or other complications due to Zika have pushed women to illegal abortions, according to the Brazilian daily Folha de São Paulo.

There are no statistics to support the rise in illegal abortions.  According to Paulo Leão, a state researcher and member of Brazil Without Abortion, said these decisions are another form of “eugenics.”  This is about $$$ and greed at the expense of the un born.  Abortions cost between $1,250 – $3,750 so it is a very lucrative business.

Planned Parenthood and leftist politicians have argued that easier access to abortion will help contain the damage the Zika virus is causing in Latin America.  Abortions may have actually hindered scientists from uncovering the link between Zika and microcephaly sooner according to virologists, Gubio Soares, who was the first to identify the presence of the Zika virus in Brazil.  There are more questions than answers as to the incidence of Zika in pregnant women and the birth defect microcephaly.

Planned Parenthood will not be happy until all of the babies whose mothers have been stricken by the Zika virus are killed.  As we reported earlier;

The United Nations agreement called the Montevideo Consensus on Population and Development urges states where abortion is illegal “to consider amending their laws, regulations, strategies and public policies relating to the voluntary termination of pregnancy in order to protect the lives and health of women and adolescent girls, to improve their quality of life and to reduce the number of abortions.”

You read the last 6 words of the last paragraph correctly.  By making abortions legal, you will reduce the number of abortions.  Only PP and the UN could have the gall to make this asinine statement.

Please support stopping the spreading of the PP culture of death into all of South America.  PP has been Trying to Make In-Roads into South America for a Long Time. 

Time to Draw a Line in the Sand.

 

 

 

Hat Tips:

http://www.breitbart.com/national-security/2016/02/01/colombia-zika-cases-reach-2100-doubles-in-a-week/

http://www.breitbart.com/national-security/2016/02/01/report-zika-causing-rise-in-illegal-abortions-in-brazil/

24 Gender Designations? God Created 2

Blatchington Mill school sex survey for 14 years olds
Blatchington Mill school sex survey for 14 years olds

Genesis 5:2:  “He created them male and female and blessed them…”

The UK government, Office of the Children’s Commissioner, is asking for pupils aged 13-18 to fill out the questionnaire shown above!  The students are asked to choose their “gender” from 24 different designations.  What is the point?

Obviously confusion is one of the purposes.  Younger children are entering puberty and are dealing with physical changes that will surpass any that they will ever experience. The questionnaire is poised to raised questions in the minds of the children without supervision, control or input from their parents. 

This is state sponsored gender confusion with the intent to suggest to young adults that there are alternatives to merely male and female and place “sexual preference” in the minds of these youth. 

Brace yourself as this same type of gender confusion will come to the US shortly.  The LGBT lobby is continuously trying to force their minority agenda onto the rest of the nation. 

The left’s goal is to start early with children and young adults and force choices onto these unsuspecting pawns.  Parents need to be vigilant to combat this onslaught of their children so they can guide them through their formative years.  Bad decisions at this stage of their lives can have long-term negative impacts on the rest of their lives.

RD Pierini

Twitter:  @RDPierini

Hat Tips:

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/12127280/Government-asks-schoolchildren-to-define-their-gender-and-gives-them-24-options-to-choose-from.html