Category Archives: Abuse of Power

DACA (Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals) and the RINOs in Congress

Image result for Trump supporting constituion

Left leaning illegal soft Speaker Paul Ryan is once again supporting the Progressive Left Agenda to leave the DACA program, Extra-Constitutionally created by Obama, in place.  Obama UNILATERALLY CREATED immigration law when he issued the executive order creating DACA after stating for years that it was up to Congress to pass a law to protect kids who were brought illegally into the US by their Illegal Parents.  The Executive Order expires on Tuesday, September 5th, next week, and could impact 800,000 DACA beneficiaries in the US.

If President Trump does not extend the program, DACA will no longer be in effect and those in this country under this program will be subject to deportation if they do not return to their country of origin when their work permits expire.  Work or Study permits are issued for 2 years under this program.

Paul Ryan Says DACA is Unconstitutional:

RINO Ryan even recently admitted that Obama did not have the CONSTITUTIONAL AUTHORITY TO CREATE THIS LAW BY SAYING:  

“President (Barack) Obama does not have the authority to do what he did … we’ve made that very clear,”

Oh Really!  What did you and the rest of the limp wrist RINOs in Congress do about it?  NOTHING AS USUAL.  Then, Ryan had the gall to say that Trump should NOT cancel the program, even though it is clearly unconstitutional (Even with Roberts as the “Chief Justice”) by saying:

“I believe that this is something that Congress has to fix.”

Well Bucko, you have had since June of 2012 to create a real DACA law or take action prohibit Obama from putting the illegal law into practice.  BUT, LIKE YOU ALWAYS DO, YOU PASS THE BUCK TO YOUR FAVORITE PUNCHING BAG, PRESIDENT DONALD J. TRUMP, so he can take the heat and you can act as innocent as the driven snow.  No Longer will this work!

Ryan and McConnell are a perfect example of why Trump is the President today.  They favor not only open borders but amnesty to support their elitist and Progressive Left money interests.

Show your support for Trump to rescind this illegal law by posting to Twitter and Facebook and contacting your Congress men and women and Senators.  Trump can transition this program out so not to drastically disrupt the pawns of the Progressive Left and the Elitist who support this illegal EO.  But, if Congress, who supposedly represents the “people”, hopefully only including US Citizens, then they can pass legislation and leave it up to Trump to sign the bill or not.

Ryan and McConnell always wait until the last-minute to act or not.  This is not leadership this is an ABUSE OF POWER.

RD Pierini

@RDPIERINI

Hat Tips:

http://www.cnn.com/2017/09/01/politics/paul-ryan-daca-trump-immigration/index.html

http://www.mcclatchydc.com/news/politics-government/white-house/article170463687.html

Advertisements

GOP & MSM Join Together to Block Trump, Not the Russian Lie

All of the GOP RINOs line up with the MSM to condemn Trump’s tweets and the leaked, and mostly untruthful, supposed Trump Collusion with Russia.  If there are no juicy Trump Russia Collusion stories in the headlines, the GOP drops bombshells like the Senate’s failure to pass the Repeal and replace of Obamacare or the RINO Ryan 2018 Anti-Trump Budget guidelines to bury the Trump Agenda advances or his special themed week topics like “Buy American”.  

Then, the RINOs all go on the MSM and bad mouth Trump’s use of Twitter or the “constant drip, drip drip,” of “his Russian Collusion” involvement that they are helping to create!

Trump Voters to the RINOs in the House and Senate:

WE GET IT, YOU ARE THE BAD GUYS AND GALS!

We stand by the Trump Agenda;  

We Reject the Russian Collusion Fallacy

We Will Reject You in 2018!

RD Pierini

@RDPierini

 

 

MSG to Trump: GOP Congress is Progressive, not Conservative

RINOs Ryan and McConnell Stab Trump and the Voters in the Back

President Trump hopefully learned an important lesson today that the GOP led House and Senate are controlled by Establishment Progressives from Both Parties and they do not agree with your Agenda nor the Agenda of “We the People” who voted for you.  

While everyone is yakking about the lack of character in the GOP led Senate, Paul Ryan in the House released HIS budget outline for 2018 that PROPOSED CUTS TO MEDICARE AND SOCIAL SECURITY!  This is the same Congress that could not see their way clear to have the guts to cut Medicaid which is an actual entitlement program that no recipient paid into, unlike Social Security and Medicare.  This move is not to be fiscally conservative, it is to trap and squeeze more seniors into a bad single payer system that will become the norm for the rest of this nation.  Squeeze enough, and us poor folk will beg Ryan and McConnell to save us!  THIS PROPOSED CUT TO SOCIAL SECURITY AND MEDICARE IS A DIRECT MIDDLE FINGER TO PRESIDENT TRUMP WHO PROMISED THAT CUTS TO THESE PROGRAMS WAS OFF LIMITS.  IS TRUMP READY TO SAY ENOUGH IS ENOUGH YET?  WE ARE!

TRUMP MUST TAKE THIS DIRECTLY TO THE VOTERS AND DEMAND THAT VOTERS TAKE IT TO THEIR CONGRESS MEN AND WOMEN AND THEIR SENATORS.  TRUMP CANNOT KEEP TRYING TO PLAY NICE WITH HARD CORE GOP ESTABLISHMENT PROGRESSIVES.

If Trump does not turn this Congress around, Ryan and McConnell both will lose their majorities.  Not one of Trump’s supporters will vote for a Democrat but they WILL STAY HOME AND NOT VOTE.  We know that this will mean that the Democrats may win but SO WHAT!  GOP led Congress just flipped us off as well.  

WE HAVE HAD ENOUGH OF RYAN, McConnell, AND THE RINO GOP PARTY.

Image result for I am mad as hell

PERIOD!!!

RD Pierini

Saint Comey Pontificates! “I am Good, Trump is Bad”

“Serious Manliness Issues”!

EX-Director of the FBI Comey kept to his pattern of seeing evil spirits in his superiors that has dated back to 2004 when he was the interim Attorney General under George W. Bush.  His personal political voyeurism and undermining of his superiors, including prior presidents, is embellished by his inflated self-importance acting under a delusional belief that he is the sole keeper of truth and justice. 

Another consistency to his behavior was his insatiable appetite for the limelight and egocentric focus on his single-handed campaign to right political “wrongs” whether the wrongs involved;

  • 2005 Enhanced interrogation objection against the Bush Administration. 
  • 2006 refusal to certify the Bush NSA domestic wiretapping program over the objections of the President and his White House Council.  (Comey’s certification was required as he was the acting AG and by law had to sign off on the program.  Thus, a single person forced the Bush administration to alter the program.)
  • In his 2007 testimony before the House and Senate Judiciary committees against the Bush Administration’s firing of certain U.S. attorneys.  Comey claimed that they were fired for political reasons and not for cause, in his view.  (By law, the president and the Attorney General have the right to fire any U.S. Attorney with or without cause.)
  • In 2013, just prior to his nomination to become the FBI director under Obama, Comey was a signatory to an amicus curiae brief submitted to the Supreme Court in support of same-sex marriage during the Hollingsworth v. Perry case.  Gay Marriage. 
  • In 2015, while the FBI director, Comey stated in a speech at Georgetown University, that police officers exhibit bias against African-Americans in carrying out their duties was a natural course of on the job learned bias.  (Great opinion to hold as the head of the premier law enforcement agency in the world)
  • In 2015, in another speech, Comey contradicted Obama’s support for police wearing body cameras.  (and you wonder why Trump may have asked if Comey would be loyal?)
  • In 2015, Comey, at a speech at the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum, linked Poland to the Holocaust along with Nazi Germany.  Comey retracted the linkage at the insistence of Ambassador Mull.  Comey stated; ” I wish I had not used any other country names because my point was a universal one about human nature”.  (Comey assumed the role of being the arbitrator and sage of and on “human nature”!)
  • In July of 2015, Comey opened the CRIMINAL investigation into the Clinton Email fiasco.  While this is worth an entire article, here are a few of Comey’s ego driven actions;
    • Gave into AG Loretta Lynch directive to call the Clinton Criminal Investigation a “MATTER” when he discussed it publicly.  
    • Comey was “concerned” when learning that the Russians may have hacked the DNC and was further “concerned” and personally distraught when AG Lynch met with Bill Clinton on the Phoenix tarmac while Comey had an open CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION (NOT A MATTER) ON HILLARY CLINTON.
    • On July 5th, 2015, Comey concluded the investigation of Clinton and announced that, “FBI’s recommendation that the United States DOJ file no criminal charges relating to the Hillary Clinton email controversy.”  This was after a 15 minute speech stating all the reasons Clinton should have been prosecuted!
    • Later in July, 2015, after receiving the Russian Dossier on Donald Trump which is a false operation research document by the democrats, the FBI opened a non-criminal investigation into the Trump Campaign!  Comey did not discuss the dossier with Trump until January, 2017, prior to Trump’s inauguration.

Comey’s career is replete with disclosing ongoing investigations, the status of ongoing investigations, and cow-towing to pressure to back off investigations, (IRS, Clinton, etc.) by the Obama Administration including its Attorney General.  Comey’s disclosures are consistently couched in statements of personal discomfort for “having to” violate protocol and discuss ongoing investigations when it suited his need for an ego boost.  Statements concerning his consternation, fear, intimidation etc. serve to try to make himself appear as the victim and the champion against evil.  (Comey is 6’8″ so the intimidation stance is a bit shallow!) 

Well, Comey’s ego puts himself above, Bush, Obama, and now Trump. 

Everyone else is bad, Comey is Good!

 

A couple of other thoughts. 

Comey’s supporters, Democrats and the Main Stream Media, put forth the idea that Comey, as the consummate professional, always documented his meetings with key Administration officials regardless of who was president.  We know this is false, if we believe Comey, and the only high level meetings he documented with a memo-to-the-file was when he met with Trump!  We have no way to know,

Comey leaked his Trump memos-to-file to the press through one of his friends.  So, he leaked confidential information regarding his meetings with the President of the United States without copying his boss the Assistant AG or the AG himself.  (No wonder he did not investigate leaking)

Comey, time and time again, discussed ongoing cases, whether they were ongoing or closed, but refused to disclose that President Trump himself was not under investigation.  Comey applies convenient standards depending whether they make Comey himself look like the champion of right versus wrong.  

Comey and the FBI apparently, according to Comey who once again discussed an open FBI case in public, did not find any wrong doing on the part of General Flynn but are pursuing a charge of “lying to the FBI”.  Remember Comey successfully prosecuted and convicted Martha Stuart for this same offense after failing to find any other wrong doing on her part.  

Personally, I think Jim Comey is a sad, pathetic, small person who hates authority figures, has a very low self-esteem, and craves accolades and media attention regardless of the consequences to the nation.

With ongoing threats from North Korea, Iran, ISIS, Al Qaeda, and others, ongoing conflicts in Syria, Iraq, and Afghanistan, a failing health care system, and a sputtering economy, Trump and the nation should be focused on something besides the ramblings of an ego-maniac and a Democrat party aided by RINO Republicans and the main stream media. 

The fate of this nation is at stake and right now our priorities are all screwed up!

RD Pierini

@RDPierini

 

Ryan, Trillion Dollar Stab in Trump’s Supporters Back!

Ryan Risking Future of GOP

Never Turn Your Back on a RINO!

Speaker Ryan seems hell-bent on driving the Republican Party back to its comfortable position of being an opposition party! 

His trillion-dollar plus Continuing Resolution today literally and figuratively ignited Trump’s base that was instrumental in keeping the GOP majority in the House and giving the GOP the majority in the Senate in 2016. 

Trump and GOP congressional voters relied on Ryan being honorable and sticking to the campaign pledges that saved their bacon in 2016.  Instead, Ryan stabbed Trump and his supporters in the back by:

  • Not Defunding Planned Parenthood.
  • Not Providing  Any Funding for Trump’s Southern Boarder Wall.
  • Not Adding Language to Take Away Funding for Sanctuary Cities.
  • Not Providing Substantial Additions to Beef Up Our Military!
  • Not Delivering a “Readable” Bill!  Instead this PORKER BILL is over 1,600 Pages Long!  Ryan Is Only Allow Lawmakers 72 Hours to Read this Traitorous Piece of Crap!

 

Democrats Dumfounded that Ryan and the GOP Congress are So Spineless! 

Image result for Chuck Schumer and Nancy Pelosi dancing

Why Win Elections?  The GOP will Surrender Anyway!

 

While Trump has to work with the GOP RINOs, he may as well admit that they will do everything to defeat him and his agenda.  Ryan and the donor class are showing Trump that “Theirs is bigger than His”!

Trump better mount the Bully Pulpit Image result for Trump's bully pulpitand call out Ryan and this travesty now or he can kiss off successfully Repealing and Replacing Obamacare, building the wall, rebuilding the military, or driving through his tax and budget plans. 

RD Pierini

#RDPierini

 

Hat Tips

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/05/01/spending-bill-language-omits-border-wall-funding-sanctuary-cities-crackdown.html

http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/terence-p-jeffrey/1665-pages-gop-spending-bill-longer-obamas-stimulus

 

US Senate Should Abolish the 60 Vote Cloture/Filibuster Rules

Senate Filibuster and Cloture Vote Rules = Tyranny of the Minority!

The Senate’s use of a filibuster or the cloture vote to stop a filibuster, IS NOT IN THE US CONSTITUTION!  It is simply a Senate “rule” that was created by the Senate itself.  

Most US Citizens believe that a majority vote in the House or Senate should be the standard for passing legislation. 

They believe that

THE RULE OF THE MAJORITY

in a democracy should be the guiding principle. 

NOT A RULE BY THE MINORITY!

Did you know that the word “filibuster” comes from a Dutch word meaning PIRATE?

Why should a minority of Senators be able to thwart the “WILL OF THE PEOPLE”?  When the people elect a majority of Senators from one political party or ideology, the people expect that the elected majority in the Senate should prevail over the minority.  IF you believe that the minority’s rights are greater than the majority’s rights then should the passing of any legislation by the Senate be approved by 100%, 99%, 90%, 75%, 66% of the senators?  In essence, the current Senate Rule 22 requiring 60 votes to close debate puts control of the Senate in the minority, not the elected majority on regular legislation.

Historical Perspective:

The Senate rule allowing for a filibuster was first adopted by the Senate in 1806 but first used later in 1837.   In 1917, the Senate adopted a rule, (Rule 22), that provided that a filibuster could be stopped by a vote of 2/3rds of the Senate.  The 2/3rds vote requirement remained until 1975. 

During this period, the Southern Democrat Senators used the high 2/3rds vote threshold to block the Civil Rights Act of 1964, including anti-lynching legislation,  until cloture was finally invoked after a 60 day filibuster. 

In 1975, the Senate modified its cloture rule allowing for a vote of 3/5ths (60 votes) to stop a filibuster.   In 2013 the Senate changed the cloture vote to a simple majority for non SCOTUS judicial appointments. Then, in 2017, the rules were changed for even SCOTUS appointments.

Voting in the Senate should be the same as in the House of Representatives where the simple majority vote carries the issue.

Hiding Behind Senate Rules:

The other obscenity that is created with the phony 60 vote majority to end debate and pass the legislation is when the party who controls lets say 52 votes puts a bill on the floor knowing full well that the minority will block cloture and force the bill to die without a vote.  Then those in the majority strut about saying well we tried by XYZ minority blocked us. 

In more concrete terms, Obamacare repeal votes took place countless times when the Republicans knew full well that the legislation would be blocked by the Senate or Obama.  House Speaker Paul Ryan also hides behind Senate Rules when he re-crafted the Obamacare Repeal and Replace blaming Senate Rules as the reason he had to water down and stage the replacement. 

Democrat Vs Republican:

Republicans wring their hands when us regular folks tell them to do away with the 60 vote cloture rule and vote up or down on everything based solely on a simple majority.  Leadership says that when Democrats are in power they will use this power against Republican and ram legislation through.  

Obama taught us that these insane legislative rules with their false majorities are inconsequential and should be predicated on a simple majority vote.  When Obama lost the majority in the House and Senate, he merely ignored the legislative and judicial branches and ruled by fiat.   If the Republicans did pass a bill, they knew Obama would veto it! 

So, it did not matter what the Republican majority was in the Senate or the House.  Both parties use these rules to hide behind.  The use of these faux votes to prove to their constituencies that they are fighting for them is ludicrous.  We are not THAT dumb!

McConnell:

Do Away with Senate Rule 22 Requiring 60 Votes to Close a Debate;

Man-up; and Vote and Be Accountable!

We The People are Not Fooled!

RD Pierini

@RDPierini

 

 

KKK Leader Rule Still Hamstrings American Voters Wishes

Image result for robert byrd kkk

Robert Byrd:  The Byrd Rule was named after former Klansman and US Senator Robert Byrd.  The Byrd Rule basically laid out the rules surrounding what could and could not be included in “budget reconciliation” and where specific inclusions could be subject to the 60 Vote cloture procedure in the Senate.  It was a further move to insure that a 40% minority in the Senate could thwart the will of the people and the majority of the people’s representatives…

The bottom line, any use of the need to have 60 out of 100 Senators vote to stop debate in the Senate is asinine in the modern era.  

A simple majority of Senators, 51, should be sufficient to represent the will of the people.   This 60 vote filibuster requirement is not a part of the Constitution but merely a Senate “Rule” that was created by the Senate and can be changed or eliminated by the Senate.  The irony of the practice of requiring a 60 vote for stopping the use of filibusters to kill legislation was used extensively by Southern Democrats to kill Civil Rights Legislation!

Paul Ryan Using, or Hiding Behind the 60 Vote Rule?: 

Ostensibly, the demise of the repeal of Obamacare and the replacement of Obamacare fell prey to the 60 vote idiocy of the US Senate rules, including the bill killing Byrd Rule.  Ostensibly, the way the repeal/replacement was structured by Paul Ryan was to circumvent the arcane Senate requiring 60 votes to overcome a fake filibuster by using the Budget Reconciliation Rules of the Senate and thus prohibiting a MINORITY of Congress, specifically the Senate, to kill the Obamacare replacement. 

Was Ryan trying to use the Senate Rules to really pass a viable replacement of Obamacare or was he hiding behind the Senate Rules to insure that the RINO goals of keeping big government in charge of health care?  Only the very few members of the Ryan leadership team really know the answer. 

The sad part is that the American People, who supported the Republican take back of the House and Senate and in November of 2016 the election of Donald Trump who ran on the repeal and replacement of Obamacare, are the losers.  Once again we counted on our Government to do their job and follow the will of the people.  Instead, Ryan and his cronies cow-towed to the will of big insurance, big pharma, and other interest groups to thwart the American People.

What is the Real Lesson?:

The real lesson that the American People have learned in watching this exercise of insanity is that the 60 Vote Cloture rule to end debate and allow a vote on a bill, whether subject to the budget Byrd Rule or not, has to be changed. 

We realize that the 60 vote rule does not make the Senate a great deliberative body but rather a slave to minority rule.  Period!

Same goes for confirmation of Presidential judicial appointments.  a simple 51 vote majority must be implemented or key judicial appointments can be derailed by 40 of the 100 Senators. 

The other use of the 60 vote rule is to try to hide behind a procedure to make themselves look good when they know full well that their vote is a farce.   All of the votes to repeal Obamacare by Republicans have been done with full knowledge that the Senate did not have the votes to stop a filibuster or last year’s when the House and Senate Republicans knew that Obama would veto the repeal vote.  But how many times have you seen Ryan and other puff out their chest and say that they voted to repeal Obamacare but X, Y, or Z stopped it from happening.  GET A MIRROR.  THE HOUSE AND SENATE REPUBLICANS, CONSERVATIVE AND RINO, HAVE ALLOWED THIS FARCE TO CONTINUE SO THEY CAN HIDE BEHIND CIRCA MID 1800’S RULES WHEN CAMPAIGNING FOR OFFICE.

Somehow, we need to force McConnell to repeal the Senate Rules to allow for majority rule.  Ryan and all Republican elected officials need to stand behind this change or nothing will ever change.

Some will say that when the Democrats are in power, they will use this Senate Rule change against us.  Where have you been the last 8 years?  The Democrats do not care about Senate Rules or the Constitution. Period!  Obama would issue an executive order and merely bypass Congress or the Constitution.  Ryan and McConnell would throw up their hands and say they don’t have the votes to overcome the Democrats. 

Enough is enough.  Trump’s agenda is OUR last chance to save this country from Progressive Rule and from the Big Donor, Big money interests that control this nation.   Obama put this country at the mercy of our sworn enemies and into the hands of the global progressive movement seats of power.

We need to stand and stand firm, NOW!

RD Pierini

@RDPierini

 

McCain Should be Impeached for Sedition

mccain-sedition

Sedition:  Conduct or Speech inciting people to rebel against the authority of a state…

The Progressive Left (P/L) has been joined by Senators McCain, Graham, and other insiders to bash Trump and discredit his administration at every turn and to thwart the will of the people.

The resignation of Army Lieutenant General Flynn as the head of the National Security Agency, gave McCain and his progressive, anti-Trump Neo-Cons another opportunity to bash Trump but worse, to question the condition of our Nation’s national security team and its capabilities.

This, at a time, when we have a new President, the bad actors in the world are looking for a chink in Trump’s armor in order to take down this nation.  McCain’s actions and rhetoric are a text-book case of Sedition as he joins the P/L to take down our Government.

McCain and Graham see Trump as more of the enemy than North Korea, Iran, Syria and others and are obsessed with Russia and the left’s fabrication of Trump’s “relationship” with Putin.  This is a classic case of paranoia fed by personal animus over Trump’s past comments about McCain.  Trump has tried to put this feud be him but McCain continues to fuel this silly fight to the detriment of our nation.  McCain may have been a war hero years ago but that does not give him a free pass to out our nation at risk.

McCain, Graham, and other republican senators and representatives are classic examples of why we need term limits.  Their own personal interests and views take precedence over the nation’s interests or the will of the people.

They refuse to see our elections as the will of the people and join the P/L in their insane quest to de-legitimize the Trump Presidency.  They are stoking the fires of discontent and are by their own actions engaging in Seditious behavior worthy of impeachment.

RD Pierini

@RDPierini

 

Hat Tips:

http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/video/mccain-sees-nsc-disarray-michael-flynns-resignation-45483172

http://www.azcentral.com/story/news/politics/azdc/2017/02/14/sen-john-mccain-michael-flynn-resignation-highlights-dysfunction-trump/97888784/

Can the WE and the FBI Survive The Comey/Clinton Chronicles?

Image result for comey clinton

Yesterday, October 28th, James Comey, the Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation sent a letter to a select group of 16 Congressional Committee leaders, eight Republicans and eight Democrats, announcing that:

“Yesterday, the investigative team briefed me on their recommendation with respect to seeking access to emails that have recently been found in an unrelated case. Because those emails appear to be pertinent to our investigation, I agreed that we should take appropriate steps to obtain and review them.”

He went on to say that:

“At the same time, however, given that we do not know the significance of this newly discovered collection of emails, I don’t want to create a misleading impression. In trying to strike that balance, in a brief letter, and in the middle of an election season, there is significant risk of being misunderstood, but I wanted you to hear directly from me about it.”

The “unrelated case” was the investigation of Anthony Weiner, the husband of Clinton’s top aide and confidant, Huma Abedin.  Weiner adds his own level of sleaze to the Clinton scandal portfolio as he is being investigated for “sexting” with a 15-year-old minor female.  Ostensibly, the Weiner investigation led to emails sent by or forwarded from Clinton/Abedin and others.  These emails uncovered communications not yet discovered in the previous FBI Clinton Email probe.  This latter point is a legal violation of a Congressional subpoena, past FOIA requests, and the prior FBI investigation itself.

Personally, I credit an open letter sent to Director Comey from a retired FBI special agent, Hugh Galyean, following Comey’s “non-indictment indictment” of Hillary Clinton in July of this year.  In Comey’s July address, he carefully laid out a criminal case against Hillary Clinton then surprisedly announced at the end of his address that he would not be recommending any legal action to be taken against Clinton by the DOJ.  Since then, a large number of former and current FBI agents and Department of Justice prosecutors have criticized Comey’s lack of referral in the Clinton investigation.  I believe Comey succumbed to weight of being known as the FBI Director who abandoned the agencies principle for political expediency.

Enough of what I think of Comey’s past and present action or inaction.  The following is the full text of the letter from SA Galyean.  Read it for yourself, then decide if a majority of your staff, and specifically the total of the Clinton Investigation team, held this opinion of you and your actions.  Could you remain silent and take no further action?  Or, would you step up and do the right thing?  Decide for yourself…

Open Letter to Comey from Retired Agent Galyean

Mr. James Comey, Director

Federal Bureau of Investigation

J. Edgar Hoover Building

935 Pennsylvania Avenue N.W

Washington, D.C.  20535-0001

Sir,

I am writing regarding your public statement in July, 2016 informing the American people that the FBI investigation of Hillary Clinton was being closed without referring it to a Federal Grand Jury or the Attorney General of the U. S. for a decision whether or not to indict her. Strangely, you eloquently laid out enough of the evidence deduced from the investigation to strongly indicate there was abundant evidence uncovered during the investigation and interview of her to not only indict but to convict her in  Federal Court.­­­­­­­ ­­­­­­However, you personally  re-worded and soft-pedaled the actions she took as Secretary of State describing her actions as “extremely careless” in using a personal email and un-secured server for her communications while Secretary of State. You rewrote the statute, which is not your job.

As a retired Special Agent of the FBI, I have standing to write this letter. My thirty years in law enforcement, including 22 years as a Special Agent with the FBI have given me the knowledge, expertise and experience to question and confront you for your perplexing actions, which (as you well know) were outside the normal standard operating procedure of the FBI and Federal judicial procedures. Some of the finest people in the world proudly carry the credentials of FBI Agent and you have soiled them and not allowed them to speak. But I will not be silent.

Sorry, but NO SIR, MS Clinton was not merely careless or extremely careless. She was not even negligent or grossly negligent (as the statute requires). Hillary Clinton was knowingly purposeful in her decisions and actions to set up a server under her exclusive control and possession in order to control what information was available to the American public and Congress regarding her actions as Secretary of State. Furthermore, she took those government-owned communications into her personal possession after leaving her position and knowingly and willingly attempted to destroy them so her nefarious actions could never be known or used as evidence of her corrupt moral character against her.

Sir, what possessed you? Did you cave in to political pressure to unilaterally come to this decision? I fear that is the case, and Rule of Law be damned. I am embarrassed for and ashamed of you. You have set a precedent that can never be rectified… and certainly not justified. Shame on you, Sir. You ought to resign right now in disgrace for what you have done to tarnish the reputation of the finest Law Enforcement Agency in the world… for entirely political reasons.

Normally, an investigation will be assigned to an agent, or team of agents with one being the Case agent, or the lead investigator. When the investigation is complete, an investigative report will be presented to the U.S. Attorney for the Federal District involved.  It would be the U.S. Attorney who decides whether to decline prosecution for that investigation… NOT the FBI agent. But in the Clinton investigation, YOU (unilaterally) decided not to forward the investigation to the U.S. Attorney or the Attorney General of the U.S., but instead personally made the decision not to prosecute her or even provide the information to a Federal Grand Jury.  You were wrong to take this upon yourself.

Sir, in order to indict a subject, only a preponderance of evidence, or 51% is needed for probable cause to exist. You did not think even that level of probability existed? Who do you think you are fooling? What judicial proceeding did you think you were following?

Throughout my years with the FBI, I (along with my fellow agents) took great pride in conducting each investigation in an unbiased manner regardless of the subject’s position or standing in the community.

All were treated equally under the law. But you, Sir, decided to allow this corrupt, evil and nasty human being to go free and unchallenged for her treasonous actions (yes, treasonous, in my opinion) which threatened the security of this nation. Furthermore, you stopped short of investigating the Clinton Foundation as a RICO case (Racketeering Influenced and Corrupt Organization.  This is a RICO case if

there ever were one. Even an untrained person can tell from the communications which were recovered that Hillary Clinton spent more time working for the Clinton Foundation while Secretary of State than on State Business.  It may be argued that Hillary did not do any State business UNLESS the Clinton Foundation benefitted.  You decided to just let this uncomfortable truth alone without addressing it.

I will conclude with this:  Following my retirement from the FBI, I volunteered for a 12 month tour of duty in Afghanistan as a Law Enforcement Professional, embedded with U.S. forces as a subject matter expert in counter-terrorism investigations.  For most of that year I operated “outside the wire” patrolling with the troops, interviewing witnesses to IED incidents and gathering evidence on the bad guys.  The results of my work would then be reported through secure channels to the Commanding Officer.  All reports and communications were required to be transmitted via secure and encrypted devices.  Occasionally my remote location in the mountains of Afghanistan made transmission impossible and I would have to fly back to Bagram Air Base in order to securely report to the Commander of the battle space.   It would have been convenient if I could have just called the Commander on my personal cell phone or written him an email on my personal laptop.  But, had I done so I would have been reporting classified information via an unsecured device and it could have been compromised. These were, relative to Secretary of State communications, low-level classifications of Secret.  Had I ever sent even one in such a manner I would have been prosecuted and sent to Federal Prison for 20 years or so.  That is how serious this violation is considered.

Now, because of you, Hillary Clinton is allowed to continue her RICO activities and is running for President of the United States, the most powerful position in the world.  You have trampled on the Rule of Law and destroyed the trust of the American people in the FBI and in unbiased enforcement of the law.  How do you sleep at night? It is time for you to go and work for the Clinton Foundation.

Sincerely,

Hugh W. Galyean

(FBI Agent, Retired)

 

Your decision on November. 

Do you want 4 more years of the Clinton’s, Abedin, and Weiner lawlessness and stain on the highest office of the United States? 

It is time to

Drain the Swamp!

 

RD Pierini

@RDPierini

 

 

Hat Tips

http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2016/10/28/comey-fbi-memo-agents-clinton-weiner-emails/

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2016/10/29/exclusive-comey-memo-to-fbi-staffers-says-election-timing-required-disclosure-renewed-probe.html

http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2016/10/a_retired_fbi_agent_addresses_james_comey_on_the_hillary_clinton_investigation.html

 

Fox News In the Tank for Hillary?

The Post-Ailes-Murdock Impact

Cooking the Books to Dampen Trump Enthusiasm

fox_news_channel_upside-downThis week’s Fox Presidential Poll was disturbing as it showed a significant gain by Hillary over Trump.  BUT, when you look at the 64 pages of the “internals” of the poll, you quickly see that the poll was deliberately manipulated! 

The preference or “how would you vote today” section showed that on 10/16, Hillary cornered 48.5% of the respondents while Trump was down to 40.0%!  One month ago, 9/16, the poll was virtually deadlocked with only a half a percent difference.  Hillary came in at 45.5% and Trump was on her pumps at 45.0% which is a virtual tie.

So, what happened?  Was it the 11-year-old recording of Trump trash talking or was it something else.  Why did 3,000 WikiLeaks emails have no impact on Hillary’s numbers?  The answer is that the poll was cooked! 

How?  Just poll a higher percentage of Democrats versus Republican registered and likely voters.  The chart below shows the sampling breakdowns for both 10/16 and 9/16 for both Democrat and Republicans.  Fox increased the percentage of Democrats from 40% on 9/16 to 44.5% on 10/16.  This is an increase of 4.5% more Democrats that were included in the poll.  But, it is worse!  Republican voters comprised 37.5% on 9/16 but were reduced to 35.5% on 10/16!  This is a decrease of 2.5% of Republican respondents. 

When you add the increase in Democrats with the decrease in Republicans between 9/16 and 10/16, you will find that the 10/16 poll sampled 6.5% more Democrats in the current poll!  In the 9/16 poll, the difference between Democrats and Republicans was on 2.5%.  In the current poll this difference was increased to 9.0%.

fox-poll-9-16

Why would Fox Do This?

First of all, have you heard ANY Fox anchor, analyst, reporter or janitor even hint that the internals of the polling were changed?  NOPE!

So, when Fox News has been leaning slightly more towards Trump the Hillary, why would they join with the left and cook the polls to show Trump declining in order to discourage Trump supporters?   Trace the attitudes at Fox to the departure of Roger Ailes and the take back by Globalist Rupert Murdock and his sons of Fox News that is owned by Murdock’s parent company News Corp. 

Murdock is an open border, “Free Trade” proponent, globalist who strongly disagrees with Trump’s policies regarding immigration, border security, trade, and many others.  Murdock, Fox, now is subtly, or not, moving Fox towards an Anti-Trump atmosphere.  Murdock is fighting Sean Hannity, Lou Dobbs and others who openly support Trump.  The Murdock boys even have come out and said that the anti-Trump pin-up host Megyn Kelly is the future of Fox.

trump 1

So, you really need to begin to filter what you are hearing on Fox like you do with CNN and other MSM outlets.  The message may not be overtly anti-Trump, but the innuendo will lead to a pro-Hillary conclusion.  From now until the week before the election, do not get discouraged with polls that show Trump down. 

Keep pushing, campaigning and exposing the utter gutter corruption of the Clintons

or we will lose the White House, the Supreme Court,

and our Constitutional freedoms and rights.

RD Pierini

@RDPierini